Federal Contracts for People with Disabilities: Services Proposed for Deletion

You might care about this because the federal government is considering changes to how certain services are contracted. The Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled is proposing to remove several services from its special Procurement List. This list usually means these jobs are set aside for non-profit agencies that employ people who are blind or have other severe disabilities. The proposed deletions include custodial services at places like the Frederick Law Olmsted Historic Site, the John Fitzgerald Kennedy National Historic Site, and Washington's Headquarters National Historic Site in Massachusetts. Janitorial and custodial services are also being considered for removal at a federal office building in Fort Collins, Colorado, and the Carson City Federal Building in Nevada. Another custodial service at the William R. Burke Courthouse in Lufkin, Texas, is also on the list. If these services are removed, they may no longer be required to be provided by these specific agencies. The public has until August 15, 2026, to comment on these proposed changes. This notice ensures transparency in federal contracting that affects employment for people with disabilities. These proposed deletions are interesting because they touch on a program designed to create jobs for people with severe disabilities. The Committee for Purchase was set up to help these individuals find meaningful work through federal contracts. When services are taken off this list, it could mean that the opportunities for non-profit agencies employing blind or severely disabled people to secure those specific contracts might change. It raises questions about why these particular services are no longer considered suitable for the program or if the agencies currently providing them can no longer meet the requirements. This action could impact the financial stability of the non-profit organizations and the employment of the people they serve. It also shows the ongoing review process for federal programs that support specific groups. Understanding these changes helps explain how the government manages its contract awards. People who would find this document most interesting include leaders and staff of non-profit agencies that employ people who are blind or have severe disabilities. These organizations rely on the Procurement List for job opportunities for their employees. Disability advocates and groups supporting employment for people with disabilities would also be very interested in these proposals. Government contractors who bid on services like janitorial or custodial work might also pay close attention. If these services are removed from the list, new bidding opportunities could open up for other companies. Federal facility managers and contracting officers for agencies like the National Park Service and the GSA, who use these services, would also need to be aware of these potential changes. Lastly, anyone interested in federal procurement policies and how the government supports employment for different groups will find this information relevant.