EPA Corrects Dates in New Hampshire Clean Air Act Rule

You might care about this because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published an important correction. This document fixes errors in a proposed rule that deals with New Hampshire's petition under Section 176A of the Clean Air Act. The original document, published on August 11, 2026, contained incorrect dates. Specifically, it listed "August 18, 2026" which should have been "August 23, 2026" in one place. In another part of the same document, "August 8, 2026" was changed to "August 18, 2026." These kinds of date corrections are important because they can affect public comment periods or other deadlines related to federal regulations. This correction ensures that the official record is accurate and reflects the correct timelines for this particular EPA action. What is interesting about this document is how it highlights the importance of accuracy in official government publications. Even small changes, like correcting a few dates, are taken seriously. The Federal Register is the daily journal of the United States government. It publishes proposed and final rules, notices, and presidential documents. When a mistake is found, like an incorrect date in a proposed rule, a correction notice must be issued. This ensures that everyone relying on these documents has the most precise and up-to-date information. It shows the government's commitment to maintaining clear and correct public records, which is essential for fair and transparent administrative processes. Several groups would find this legal document interesting. Anyone tracking environmental policy, especially those concerned with the Clean Air Act, would want to know about these changes. Residents and organizations in New Hampshire might find it relevant, given the original petition relates to their state. Legal professionals, environmental advocates, and industries subject to EPA regulations would also pay close attention. Additionally, people interested in government transparency and administrative law would see this as an example of how federal agencies correct their official records. It matters to anyone who needs to understand specific deadlines or timelines in EPA rule-making.